Lewis v. Harris II —“civil union” versus “marriage”, one more time
Last month, on behalf of several same-sex couples, Lambda Legal filed a “Petition in Aid of Litigants’ Rights” with the New Jersey Supreme Court, asking for further relief in Lewis v. Harris, 908 A.2d...
View ArticleBizarro Section 1982 and “civil union”— a thought experiment in unequal names
Suppose that, immediately after the Civil War, instead of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1862, the Congress had enacted a statute that provided: “All citizens of the United States shall have the same right in every...
View ArticleNew Jersey Marriage Equality Part II: When Lewis Met Windsor
United States v. Windsor, – U.S. –, 133 S.Ct. 2675 (2013), invalidated the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) on somewhat murky constitutional grounds. It also provided the catalyst for this...
View ArticleLewis v. Harris II —“civil union” versus “marriage”, one more time
Last month, on behalf of several same-sex couples, Lambda Legal filed a “Petition in Aid of Litigants’ Rights” with the New Jersey Supreme Court, asking for further relief in Lewis v. Harris, 908 A.2d...
View ArticleBizarro Section 1982 and “civil union”— a thought experiment in unequal names
Suppose that, immediately after the Civil War, instead of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1862, the Congress had enacted a statute that provided: “All citizens of the United States shall have the same right in every...
View ArticleNew Jersey Marriage Equality Part II: When Lewis Met Windsor
United States v. Windsor, – U.S. –, 133 S.Ct. 2675 (2013), invalidated the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) on somewhat murky constitutional grounds. It also provided the catalyst for this...
View ArticleLewis v. Harris II —“civil union” versus “marriage”, one more time
Last month, on behalf of several same-sex couples, Lambda Legal filed a “Petition in Aid of Litigants’ Rights” with the New Jersey Supreme Court, asking for further relief in Lewis v. Harris, 908 A.2d...
View ArticleBizarro Section 1982 and “civil union”— a thought experiment in unequal names
Suppose that, immediately after the Civil War, instead of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1862, the Congress had enacted a statute that provided: “All citizens of the United States shall have the same right in every...
View ArticleNew Jersey Marriage Equality Part II: When Lewis Met Windsor
United States v. Windsor, – U.S. –, 133 S.Ct. 2675 (2013), invalidated the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) on somewhat murky constitutional grounds. It also provided the catalyst for this...
View Article
More Pages to Explore .....